On October 14, Shenzhen Futian District Court case of contract disputes, so two years ago "4.5 million public-relations push ban disposable foam plastic dishware" aftermath questioned again.
March 2013 end of, national NDRC issued a announced, will one-time sent bubble plastic tableware (referred to sent bubble tableware) from eliminated products directory in the delete, May up entered into force, this means with was disabled 14 years of sent bubble tableware get "lifted"--same day, a copies legal special service agreement in network Shang was exposure, agreement in the methyl b both agreed, if sent bubble tableware was lifted, party to b paid 4.5 million Yuan costs (which early paid 500,000 yuan service fee). Central media survey: why Guo sex trade has not
Agreement was triggered "companies lobbying the Government to change its policy of" question, Shi Jia plastic products related enterprises in Guangdong, where party a is b is zejun, LLP (Shenzhen) law firm (hereinafter referred to as junzejun law firm).
14th, June Ze June law firm case against ten companies in the Futian Court.
Surging News (www.thepaper.CN) get of indictment displayed, the law where agreed term within, completed has ten home enterprise by delegate of matters, achieved has contract agreed target, that sent bubble tableware lifted, however ten home enterprise is refused to paid the law by remaining of 4 million Yuan lawyer fee, was will its v to court, requests court decree ten home accused enterprise, common paid lawyer fee 4.82 million Yuan (including 820,000 yuan late payment interest).
However, with the hearing of the case, and also ten of the accused companies a counterclaim plaintiff junzejun law cases.
Counterclaim alleges that ten of the accused companies believe that plaintiffs ' law firms not in compliance with the agreement, enterprises pay 500,000 yuan service charge, for law firms, "public relations, entertainment, communication," in violation of the law, and counterclaim request the plaintiff to return paid 500,000 yuan.
In March 2013, the plaintiffs ' lawyers, the gentleman Ze June law lawyer Zhou Xiaoqing has been introduced when in an interview with the voice of China, the agreement is a very good lawyer, "' public relations ' of the word, is thinking to several media outlets to do some special reports. This is media PR, here he becomes refers specifically to the Government's ' public relations ', this is not true. "
June Ze June law where indictment in the statement, the law by specific expand work, including research finishing national on sent bubble tableware industry policy history, wrote publicity information contact media, recommends and help ten home Enterprise launched established Guangdong Province plastic tableware Association, drafting application lifted file; 2012 times to national NDRC, and Ministry, about sector reflect situation, and expression demands, to national NDRC application information public,.
Defence lawyer Shen Hongbing surging news, concluded that uniquely reflects the "do the work", was submitted to the Commission information three times, "one of the replies to the disclosure request inadmissible, there is no real role."
Shen Hongbing says defendant firms consider the ban policy and counsel does not have any associated, in fact, is the major trade association, as well as experts and scholars, and "ban announced results after the validity period of the agreement."
The people magazine sponsored by the people's daily reported in 2013, foaming tableware was banned 14 years, sales of some 14 billion every year, "no more than" behind the former State economic and Trade Commission enacted the prohibition of white pollution "6th" still subject to dispute.
According to the report, in 2006, the Counselor of the State Council, Ye Ruqiu, Shi Dinghuan once wrote to then-Vice Premier Zeng Peiyan, proposed to amend the "6th"; the end of July 2009, the Ministry held national expert symposiums around the "foaming tableware" debate for up to 6.5 hours.
In this case, the fulfilment of obligations of the parties, the contract is illegal, ban goal disputes such as whether agreement is reached within the time limit, and how protocols work by Community law and causal relationship between lift, surging news contact plaintiffs ' lawyers Zhou Xiaoqing, tries to ask their views being declined.
Zhou Xiaoqing said, in order to avoid interference with the courts and judicial decisions, not an interview, also did not respond to the question of why two years after a lawsuit.
After the end of the 14th day of the trial, the Court not pronouncing, will choose a day of the original, the respondent issued a judgement on both sides.
No comments:
Post a Comment